Search for: "United States v. Alvarez" Results 641 - 660 of 661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2013, 7:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Car market v. moral relations—treating people as other humans rather than anthropological units. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In the first, United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Alvarez v Popect Hosp. ruled that when the moving party has demonstrated entitlement to summary judgment, the burden of proof shifts to the opposing party which must demonstrate by admissible evidence the existence of a factual issue requiring trial. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
A.D. 2002) (Bexis’ case); Alvarez v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:42 pm by Patricia Wald
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 577 (2005): “It is fair to say that the United States now stands alone in a world that has turned its face against the juvenile death penalty. [read post]
15 May 2012, 4:05 pm by sevach
Por cierto, me agrada especialmente el juez Alex Kozinsky antes citado, presidente de la Corte Suprema de California, ya que es el autor de la sentencia mas famosa de EEUU , dictada en el año 1990 por su sentido del humor al introducir en su célebre sentencia (United States v.Syufy Enterprises, 1990) la cita de 200 títulos de películas entre su argumentación. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am by Kenneth Vercammen
_________________________________June 29, 2012 Argued April 23, 2012 - DecidedBefore Judges Parrillo, Alvarez and Skillman. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]