Search for: "United States v. Bare" Results 641 - 660 of 1,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller and Wellons did not purchase an investment unit. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 6:53 am by Jani
This has been seen different in the United States, as under the Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service decision (more on which can be found here) effort alone won't give a work protectability under copyright. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:50 am by Jon Hyman
Because Hutchinson was a public employee proceeding under the United States Constitution, Title VII did not define the court’s limits. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
  CITIZENS UNITED, ELANA KAGAN, AND THE QUESTION THAT HAD NO PLAUSIBLE ANSWERMost liberals and progressives view Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:38 am by CMS
Steven Sieff, consultant in the tax team at CMS, offers a preview of the decision awaited in Project Blue Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs After initially being heard by the First-tier Tribunal in 2013 and most recently by the Court of Appeal in 2016, the Project Blue SDLT case finally reached the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on 28 February 2018. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:54 am
Instead, he recommended allowing the Judicial Conference of the United States to do its job, studying the issue and recommending any necessary changes through the ordinary process for amending the civil rules. [read post]
Best Deals Discount Furniture LLC, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently granted plaintiff 2109971 Ontario Inc. [read post]
Best Deals Discount Furniture LLC, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently granted plaintiff 2109971 Ontario Inc. [read post]
Best Deals Discount Furniture LLC, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently granted plaintiff 2109971 Ontario Inc. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
As Petitioners and the United States agree, Congress understood and incorporated that common-law meaning of "treated as the publisher" into Section 230(c)(1). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm by Jason Rantanen
United States, 263 U.S. 50 (1923), does not provide any guidance regarding prosecution laches because Woodbridge never received a patent. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:46 pm by Fiona de Londras
Indeed, some years ago the International Court of Justice had found a violation of the VCCR in relation to a group of people of whom Garcia was a member in the case of Avena v United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Wade will be repealed (with abortion still possibly legal on a state-by-state basis) but whether the Court would invent a doctrine under which abortion would be constitutionally prohibited nationwide.Beyond abortion, I asked whether even Griswold v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
That's no excuse at all; when the United States Attorney endows lawyers with the powers of federal prosecutors, he has a responsibility to properly train and supervise them so as to avoid trampling defendants' rights. [read post]