Search for: "United States v. Connors" Results 641 - 660 of 1,376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Clearly, O'Connor believes that women offer a qualitatively different (perhaps even better) perspective than men in certain settings.Justice GinsburgIn United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
During the Federal Action, plaintiff raised concerns regarding Liu’s conduct, submitting a letter application to United States District Judge John P. [read post]
O’Connor, a former Harris County prosecutor, represents individuals, businesses, and organizations in several areas of law all over Texas and the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by MBettman
In a 5-2 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, and joined by Justices Lanzinger, French, O’Donnell, and Chief Justice O’Connor, the court held that Ohio does not recognize the tort of negligent misidentification, and mooted the certified questions sent by the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division: These were the questions: What is the statute of limitations for claims of negligent misidentification? [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:06 am by Ilya Somin
As Kennedy put it for the Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Conor McEvily
” Finally, Joan Biskupic of the USA Today previews next week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190 Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm by Schachtman
Back in the day, some Circuits of the United States Court of Appeal embraced an asymmetric standard of review of district court decisions concerning the admissibility of expert witness opinion evidence. [read post]