Search for: "United States v. Doe Co." Results 641 - 660 of 8,541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 11:23 am by K. Hollyn Hollman
She is an adjunct professor of law at the Georgetown University Law Center, where she co-teaches the Church-State Law Seminar. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 930 F.2d 867, 871 n.2 (Fed. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:00 am
It further found that the CWA does not unequivocally do so because Section 1365 – a section explicitly dealing with United States and governmental sovereign immunity – does not mention tribal sovereign immunity. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:08 am by Steve Satterfield
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan has allowed a putative class action under Michigan law to proceed against several magazine publishers that allegedly sold lists of their customers’ names, addresses, and subscription choices to third parties. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am by Benjamin Wittes
Department of State, has the following analysis of the International Court of Justice’s decision Friday in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:21 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published Examination Guidelines to help examiners make decisions regarding the obviousness (or lack thereof) of claimed inventions in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Rubber Co., 643 F. 3d 1013, 1017–1021 (CA7 2011); Doe I v.Nestle USA, Inc., 766 F. 3d 1013, 1020 1022 (CA9 2014); Doe VIII v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:25 am by OLF
Standard Insurance Company, Case No. 20-cv-2449, decided by the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on August 19, 2022. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
But at least Justice Holmes acknowledged that "[o]f course an employee of the United States does not secure a general immunity from state law while acting in the course of his employment. [read post]