Search for: "United States v. Generes" Results 641 - 660 of 35,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
One of the nice things about the being a Justice of the United States Supreme Court is that you never have to explain yourself. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:59 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 Here is the current language:"That the General Assembly finds and declares that this resolution is passed in accordance with the method provided to states in Article V of the Constitution of the United States for proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:59 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Brown is widely cited as one of the most significant decisions interpreting the United States Supreme Court’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:33 pm by highrank
Most individuals know that the Fifth Amendment of United States Constitution allows individuals to remain silent rather than incriminating themselves with police. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 11:37 am by Catherine V. Wadhwani
District Court for the Eastern District of California issued its ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 10:06 am by Michael Price
  Earlier this year, the Second Circuit waded into these waters when an en banc panel decided United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
” Many members of Congress, sometimes quoting President Andrew Johnson or Attorney General James Speed, declared that the president was “the chief executive officer of the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has finally held that the mark is generic and not entitled to registration. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:51 am by sally
Regina (New London College Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 51; [2012] WLR (D) 21 “The suspension or withdrawal of a general (student) sponsor licence granted to a United Kingdom college to sponsor and enrol students from non-European Economic Area countries on point based immigration control, to study in the college, was not an infringement of the college’s Convention right to its possessions within the meaning of… [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
United States Supreme Court distinguishes a law from a regulation for the purposes the federal whistle blower statute Department of Homeland Security v MacLean, USSC #13-984 A federal air marshal publicly disclosed that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) had decided to cut costs by removing air marshals from certain flights. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix Chambers.
Extradition in the public interest would, however, generally be proportionate under Article 8(2) (Norris v Government of the United States of America (No.2) [2010] 2 AC 487). [read post]