Search for: "United States v. Head"
Results 641 - 660
of 6,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2012, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 11:31 am
United States, Customs has decided to revoke the earlier ruling and classify the merchandise in Heading 9018 as instruments and appliances used in medical, surgical, dental or veterinary sciences . . . . [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Some people decry the "softening" of the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:30 pm
The case of Regan v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 11:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is this morning’s United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 11:12 am
--As to the 1876 case:--In its 1876 decision in Russell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 10:45 pm
United States Filter Corp., et al, a 13-page, 4-0 opinion, Chief Justice Shepard writes:Five corporations seek insurance coverage from insurers who issued liability policies for their predecessors. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:49 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:39 pm
After certifying that Benway was acting within the scope of her employment at the time of the action, the United States was be substituted as a defendant in the action. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
Back in 1995 the United States Postal Service (USPS) sponsored the cycling team headed by Lance Armstrong, its top rider. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
Back in 1995, the United States Postal Service (USPS) sponsored the cycling team headed by Lance Armstrong, its top rider. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:00 pm
Back in 1995, the United States Postal Service (USPS) sponsored the cycling team headed by Lance Armstrong, its top rider. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:59 pm
Last week, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a petition for rehearing en banc with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, imploring the court to reconsider a divided panel’s ruling on the unconstitutionality of its administrative law judges in Bandimere v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
That' s not going to happen now.The Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:28 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:42 pm
Plus has a neat little stateless-citizen-federal-diversity-jurisdiction issue thrown in there for good measure.But I nonetheless can't help thinking that it's the equivalent of an opinion that says that exactly 48.6 angels can fit on an average-size pin manufactured in the eastern seaboard of the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 11:28 am
Yes, we're a bit nit-picky when the United States is concerned, and, yes, the United States has promulgated rules that are very much in favor of . . . surprise, surprise . . . the United States. [read post]
