Search for: "United States v. Murphy" Results 641 - 660 of 998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
United States, which interpreted the Fourth Amendment to impose certain limits on the warrantless collection of the historical cell phone location records of a criminal suspect; (3) Murphy v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 11:43 am by Price Felker
Hogue pressed upon the importance of the election for preserving Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am by bndmorris
Ramirez’s article Adaption to Future Water Shortages in the United States is Caused by Population Growth and Climate Change is cited in the following article: Edward J. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
” The Appellate Division ruled that the individual was entitled to such a hearing [Murphy v City of New York, 35 AD3d 319].Further, on the issue of “public disclosure,” courts have ruled that the internal disclosure of allegedly stigmatizing reasons for the discharge or demotion of an employee to agency administrators “having a right to know” does not constitute a public disclosure of such information and thus a name-clearing hearing" was not… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Just this week, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In 1876, lawyer and legal publisher Carl Jahn published the first issue of the Weekly Cincinnati Law Bulletin, a precursor of the Ohio State Bar Journal, and solicited Ohio lawyers to submit “law points of general interest. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Charles-Pierre had, in fact, timely filed her oath of office on February 7, 2017, which is within the 30-day period specified in Chapter 5. 1 Section 30 excuses the failure to file the oath within the 30-day period if the individual “was on active duty in the armed forces of the United States and absent from the county of his [or her] residence at the time of his [or her] election or appointment.... [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:49 am
The case was the subject of a 1992 book, Fatal Subtraction: The Inside Story of Buchwald v. [read post]