Search for: "United States v. Nevada" Results 641 - 660 of 1,319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2014, 10:14 am by Michael Kun
On December 9, 2014, a unanimous United States Supreme Court answered that question – no. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:06 am by Greg Mersol
December 9, 2014), a unanimous United States Supreme Court held that it was not. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:44 pm by Jason Weiner
Refusing to Give a Statement According to the United States Constitution, you do not have to give an incriminating statement against yourself. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
FinnCase number: 13-cv-02280 (United States District Court for the District of Nevada)Case filed: December 16, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 15, 2014 11/26/2014 02/24/2015 2014-128 SEC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
Since the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:14 pm by Gene Quinn
(“Halo”), who appealed from multiple decisions of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:38 pm
Second, it adds to the already long and impressive string of victories by same-sex marriage advocates in numerous court decisions since the Supreme Court issued United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:16 am by William Eskridge
This ongoing, thoughtful process contributed not only to the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision striking down Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]