Search for: "United States v. Stanford" Results 641 - 660 of 1,256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Leading scholars will offer brief reflections on the long history of black freedom movements, their significance to United States history more generally, and their relevance for today. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 1605(a)(2), a tort claim for personal injuries suffered in connection with travel outside of the United States is “based upon” the allegedly tortious conduct occurring outside of the United States or the preceding sale of the ticket in the United States for the travel entirely outside the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 14/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 23rd February, judgment will be handed down in Craig (AP) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, on appeal from [2020] HCJAC 22. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Scott Anderson, Suzanne Maloney, Natan Sachs and Hady Amr spoke about the meaning of the deal for the domestic political environments of Israel, Iran and the United States, its potential impact on the Palestinians and how the agreement could change regional dynamics more broadly: Daniel Byman discussed how a new administration could more effectively combat rising white supremacist violence in the United States. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 Individuals with law degrees occupy roughly half the state governorships, more than half the seats in the United States Senate, and more than a third of the seats in the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court could potentially change the securities class action litigation landscape in the United States, as the Court considers whether or not to dump the fraud on the market theory. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment holding that Congress properly delegated authority in the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act to the U.S. attorney general to apply the law’s registration requirements, suggests that “[t]he more conservative justices, aligned with the dissent, favor disciplining the administrative state but not the national security president. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:58 am by Florian Mueller
"If only 1% of all class action plaintiffs wanted to attend the January FTC v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:37 am by Dennis Crouch
Roche Molecular Sys., Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2188 (2011) (citing United States v. [read post]
And gay people can now marry, thanks to a changing climate of opinion, and thanks to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
Stanford, California : Stanford Law Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press, 2012 208 pages ; 24 cm. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Holder (Supreme Court)The Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) moves some foreign works that had been in the public domain in the United States into copyright, by extending the copyright on the titles retroactively. [read post]