Search for: "United States v. Stock" Results 641 - 660 of 2,619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2010, 6:17 am by Ashby Jones
That leaves the one factual claim in Obama's brief reference to the decision: the age of the law the court voided in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:29 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Mayer Brown and its partner. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am by Bernard Bell
Regulatory Background The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (“MSA”) establishes a program to conserve and manage of fishery resources within 200 nautical miles of the United States coastline. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am by Josh H. Escovedo
On September 9, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Costco was willfully infringing Tiffany & Co. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:30 am by James F. McDonough, Jr.
  The court held for the taxpayers stating that the gift  was of the stated dollar amount rather than percentages (units) of the LLC. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
("USEC"), which provided uranium enrichment services to the United States government, was renegotiating a contract with a Russian corporation. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
In a (not entirely successful) attempt to keep the litigation of this contentious case under control, Judge Peck, from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, bifurcated the trial—limiting the first phase to the questions of whether Iridium was insolvent or had unreasonably small capital. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Sept. 17, 2008), the United States District Court of Colorado held the presumptive lead plaintiff adequate to represent the class because its “contracts for difference” (“CFD) were “securities” under the Securities Exchange Act. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:54 am by SHG
 § 704(b), having granted cert in  United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 4:52 am
District Court did not Abuse its Discretion in Approving Class Action Settlement in Securities Fraud Class Action Filed in United States because Class Members with Claims in Canadian Class Actions were Provided Adequate Notice of the Right to Opt Out of the U.S. [read post]