Search for: "United States v. Stock"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2010, 6:17 am
That leaves the one factual claim in Obama's brief reference to the decision: the age of the law the court voided in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:00 am
(United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:42 am
In Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:29 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Mayer Brown and its partner. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am
Regulatory Background The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (“MSA”) establishes a program to conserve and manage of fishery resources within 200 nautical miles of the United States coastline. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am
On September 9, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Costco was willfully infringing Tiffany & Co. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
In 2009, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in yet another prosecutorial misconduct case in Van de Kamp v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:21 am
United States, 2019 WL 2536106 (Fed. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:49 am
The filing, ACLU of Northern California v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:30 am
The court held for the taxpayers stating that the gift was of the stated dollar amount rather than percentages (units) of the LLC. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
("USEC"), which provided uranium enrichment services to the United States government, was renegotiating a contract with a Russian corporation. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
In a (not entirely successful) attempt to keep the litigation of this contentious case under control, Judge Peck, from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, bifurcated the trial—limiting the first phase to the questions of whether Iridium was insolvent or had unreasonably small capital. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Sept. 17, 2008), the United States District Court of Colorado held the presumptive lead plaintiff adequate to represent the class because its “contracts for difference” (“CFD) were “securities” under the Securities Exchange Act. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:54 am
§ 704(b), having granted cert in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Perez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 4:52 am
District Court did not Abuse its Discretion in Approving Class Action Settlement in Securities Fraud Class Action Filed in United States because Class Members with Claims in Canadian Class Actions were Provided Adequate Notice of the Right to Opt Out of the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Apple v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
The Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]