Search for: "United States v. Thomas, Jr" Results 641 - 660 of 790
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2010, 8:45 am by Lyle Denniston
  Justice Thomas had dissented in January when the Court, in another election case (Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
United States and Barber v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Adam Chandler
United States, released earlier this month. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Thomas Porteous, Jr., judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, for high crimes and misdemeanors. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am by Jay Willis
United States, explaining that the Court’s narrow interpretation of the statute at issue “only reinforces rules prohibiting lawyers from giving unethical advice. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
International LawK5256 .M36 2010The United States, international law, and the struggle against terrorism / Thomas Michael McDonnell.McDonnell, Thomas Michael.London ; New York : Routledge, 2010. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Such questions about jury instructions are an area of legal dispute that has bounced from state courts to the United States Supreme Court and back over the past 20 years. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:26 pm
Thomas O'Connell - Judge Holland - United States - Verla Sue Holland - United States Supreme Court [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am by Matt Sundquist
ACLU of Kentucky and Van Orden v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am by Jon
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]