Search for: "United States v. United States Dist. Ct." Results 641 - 660 of 978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2009, 4:27 am
Oberg; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT;2009 U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:42 am by Eugene Volokh
And according to Hammer, she was "considered by many to be the most influential Second Amendment state lobbyist in the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am by Steve
Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975), the Supreme Court decided what procedural protections are due under the United States Constitution in cases of student suspensions for 10 days or less. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:17 am by Bexis
Ct. 2567 (2011), generic plaintiffs are picking through the wreckage much like we had to do after Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-8737, and Gibbs v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
” 15 The remaining “lesser” or “non-core” factors included the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the putative employer, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. 16 The 2021 IC Rule further provided that it was “highly unlikely” that these non-core factors could outweigh the combined probative value of the core factors. 17 The Final Rule rescinds… [read post]