Search for: "Washington Employment Law Letter" Results 641 - 660 of 1,153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2020, 9:57 am by Monica Williamson
Attorneys who are currently licensed to practice law in Washington State and maintain an office in the greater Seattle-Everett area, or law firms including such attorneys, may respond to this RFP. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 7:54 am by Monica Williamson
Umatilla is a tribal preference employer. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
-  In 2002, the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced a more than $1.5 million settlement of an employment discrimination lawsuit against DeCoster Farms on behalf of Mexican women who reported they were subjected to sexual harassment, including rape, abuse, and retaliation by some supervisory workers at DeCoster's Wright County plants. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 1:58 pm by Monica Williamson
AmeriCorps NLADA Strategic Planning, Washington, DC. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 8:01 am
The National Labor Relations Act places on employers a mandatory duty to bargain with authorized employee representatives on subjects that include rates of pay, wages, hours of employment and other conditions of employment (29 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 12:56 pm by Monica Williamson
Rosette, LLP Associate Attorney, Washington, D.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:08 am by gabrielagendreau
Echo Hawk & Olsen Associate Attorney – interested in Business Law, Business Litigation, Employment Law and who is enthusiastic about Indian law. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:48 am by David Y. Trevor
State Univ., in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, the plaintiff’s allegations implicated some cutting edge issues, but the case was decided using fundamental precepts of employment discrimination law. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:48 am by David Y. Trevor
State Univ., in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, the plaintiff’s allegations implicated some cutting edge issues, but the case was decided using fundamental precepts of employment discrimination law. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 10:25 pm by Alana Bevan
—after Hawaii, California, and Washington, D.C. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 12:25 pm by Monica Williamson
  The Nation is a tribal member and Indian preference employer. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:30 pm by Monica Williamson
Environmental Law Institute Intern, Washington, DC. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:14 am by SHG
Tucker is in the class of 2020 at the University of Texas School of Law, and shortly after Sonmez released her letter about Kaiman, she was hired by The Washington Post. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:00 pm by Lydia Estep
Bennett’s practice is focused on civil litigation, including complex construction disputes, and employment law, as well as security clearance review and government contractor suspension and debarment. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:00 am by Jay Willis
In nomination news, Paul Bedard of the USNRW Washington Whispers blog reports on the letter sent recently to the Senate Judiciary Committee by National Archivist David Ferriero, who promised members of the Committee that memos written by Elena Kagan during her time in the Clinton White House would be provided beginning on June 4. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:29 am by gabrielagendreau
Summer Clinic law clerks are a paid, full-time position, either at the UCLA School of Law campus or remotely. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 pm by admin
  The Texas Supreme Court developed a “fluid balancing test” that considers factors like educational opportunities, special needs, employment options, emotional health of the custodial parent, and the ability of the non-custodial parent to maintain a flexible work schedule and achieve visitation. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:54 am by Monica Williamson
Our fast-paced office provides legal services on issues of jurisdiction, tax, estate planning, trust assets, environmental law, natural resource development, tribal governance, employment and the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm by David Kravets
In 2009, the nation’s largest appellate court ruled that employees are not liable under the antihacking law for accessing their employers’ computers for disloyal purposes. [read post]