Search for: "Watson Appeal" Results 641 - 660 of 1,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Jim Watson, the mayor of Ottawa, ran a Twitter page on municipal affairs, notably matters that came before the municipal council. [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:24 pm by Waseem A. Mateen
Watson , plaintiff Vtio Gallina appealed a lower court’s decision against defendant Dr. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:37 pm by Juan Antunez
I previously wrote here about the last such case to make headlines; it involved a claim by an adult adoptee to a share of the trust created by Thomas John Watson, Jr., of IBM fame. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:21 am by MacIsaac
Watson (1996), 108 C.C.C. (3d) 310 at 323-24 (Ont. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:19 am by Jonathan Bailey
1: Appeals Court Affirms Sherlock Holmes Is in Public Domain First off today, Jennifer Schessler at The New York Times reports that The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a district court ruling from last December stating the the characters Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson are no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:21 am by Kelly
(IP Watch) Netherlands: The Hague Court of Appeal defines ‘offer’ prior to patent expiry: GlaxoSmithKline v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
It argued that providing the safeguards as required by Tele2/Watson would undermine the ability of the SIAs. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida et al  (Patent Docs) Surfaxin (Lucinactant) – US: PTO rules on the availability of multiple interim patent extensions (FDA Law Blog) Taxotere (Docetaxel) – Canada: Federal Court refuses to grant Order of Prohibition against Hospira regarding Docetaxel product: Sanofi v Hospira (Pharmacapsules @ Gowlings) Vigamox (Moxifloxacin) – US: Teva appeals verdict finding ANDA to market generic Vigamox infringes patent: Alcon Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am by Graham Smith
However in that case the Court of Appeal has heldthat the Tribunal decision is not susceptible of judicial review. [read post]