Search for: "Williams v. The Board of Review" Results 641 - 660 of 1,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 4:44 am by Anthony Lake
Holder,130 S.Ct. 827 (2010), the Supreme Court held, contrary to the position of the Solicitor General, that motions to reopen immigration proceedings before the Board of Immigration Appeals were subject to judicial review. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
"But a mere 3 pages earlier, he was praising Robert Jackson's 1943 opinion in West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am by NCC Staff
In 1978, Justice William Brennan wrote for a 6-3 majority in the Penn Central v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
Al., Appellees. 4th District.Contracts -- Conveyance of real property -- Limitation of actions -- Where agreement between school board and property owner clearly and unambiguously required owner to deed to school board by a specified date forty acres of land meeting certain outlined conditions, owner breached the agreement on the specified date when owner failed to deed a compliant forty-acre parcel to the school board -- Statute of limitations not tolled by intervening… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:22 am by James Bickford
”  Barnes discusses the pending petition in Williams v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Miller in Target v Williams Advanced Materials, 2007 U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:55 am by Don Cruse
BRAZOS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT AND APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD FOR BRAZOS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, No. 13-0593 Opinion of the Court Previously: One new opinion, one revised opinion, and six grants (October 5, 2014) BROWN & GAY ENGINEERING, INC. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm by Benjamin Wittes
See Opinion of Special Board of Review, Office of The Judge Advocate General, Army Service Forces, U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:59 am by Steve Vladeck
But Fleming responded effectively, suggesting that, even if the Board had acted sua sponte, the Fifth Circuit should still have had jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision, even if such review was quite deferential. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:11 am
 * Who should pay for the independence of the Boards of Appeal? [read post]