Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 641 - 660 of 2,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
U.S. District Court in Alabama Rules CTA Unconstitutional
2 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm by Bruce Zagaris
United v. [read post]
The International Enforcement Law Reporter Blog - http://ielrblog.com
FAMILY LAW IN A POST DOBBSIAN WORLD
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
S. 390, 262 U. [read post]
Pennsylvania Family Law - http://pafamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
Financial Institutions that Deny Credit to Applicants based on U.S. Citizens Could Face Serious Consequences Under 42 USC ยง 1981
7 May 2013, 5:00 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
B Commentary, ¶ 6(b)(7). [6] Guerra v. [read post]
That Credit Union Blog - http://thatcreditunionblog.wordpress.com
U.S. Notifies Criminal Defendant of Its Intention To Use FISA Information Against Him
26 Oct 2013, 2:06 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 Earlier this year, in Clapper v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Supreme Court Hands Down Messerschmidt v. Millender
22 Feb 2012, 3:23 pm by Orin Kerr
Hayden, 387 U. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
Toward a Dynamic Consumer Welfare Standard for Contemporary U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court famously proclaimed American antitrust law to be a “consumer welfare prescription” in Reiter v. [read post]
Truth on the Market - http://truthonthemarket.com/
NYS Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Holds That the Undefined Term "Reasonable Care" as Used in a Homeowners Policy's Freezing Exclusion, Is Ambiguous
21 Jun 2021, 8:46 pm
 "`[U]nder [these] circumstances, the ambiguity must be resolved against the insurer which drafted the contract'" (id.; see Cragg v Allstate Indem. [read post]
Coverage Counsel - http://nycoveragecounsel.blogspot.com/
NYS Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Holds That the Undefined Term "Reasonable Care" as Used in a Homeowners Policy's Freezing Exclusion, Is Ambiguous
21 Jun 2021, 8:46 pm
 "`[U]nder [these] circumstances, the ambiguity must be resolved against the insurer which drafted the contract'" (id.; see Cragg v Allstate Indem. [read post]
Coverage Counsel - http://nycoveragecounsel.blogspot.com/
Wednesday: What’s Hot on CanLII
7 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
In other words, prior to any sale, judicial or otherwise, while the land is held in joint tenancy, the enforcement creditor’s writ attaches only to his or her debtor’s interest in the land, less the value of any exemptions. [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca
L.M.-M. v. Cuccinelli: Trump’s Preference for Acting Officials Hits A Wall
23 Apr 2020, 8:59 am by John Lewis, Benjamin Seel, Nitin Shah
-M. v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
D.S.D.: Special Detail Exemption Recognized By 29 U.S.C. § 207(p)(1) Of The FLSA Applies To Exclude Certain Time Worked, Because Firefighters Were On Firefighting Detail Solely At Their Own Option, During Off Duty Hours, And The State And The City Are Sep
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am by Andrew Frisch
Specht v. [read post]
Overtime Law Blog | FLSA Decisions - http://overtimelaw.wordpress.com
New Maryland Social Media Evidence Opinion
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
The court's opinion in Griffin v. [read post]
Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/
Guest Post: Vivendi Plaintiffs' Argument on the Impact of Morrison v. National Australia Bank
2 Aug 2010, 1:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s June 24, 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
Potential nominee profile: Steven Colloton
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Department of Justice, and then became an assistant U. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
For The Love of Stare Decisis
18 Jun 2019, 3:30 am by SHG
Rumsey, 467 U. [read post]
Simple Justice - http://blog.simplejustice.us
U.S. Supreme Court to consider transgender restroom lawsuit
15 Jan 2017, 3:30 am by Utah Employment Law Letter
In Schroer v. [read post]
Diversity Insight - http://blogs.hrhero.com/diversity/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
”   Some amici, such as Professor Kurt Lash, have filed briefs arguing that the presidency is not a “disqualified” office covered by the Positions Clause—in other words, that Section 3 permits someone to serve as President (or Vice-President) even if they are a covered person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States (indeed, even if they’ve “given aid or comfort” to foreign… [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Second Degree Harassment: What Can Happen to an NY PL 240.26 Charge When Your Initial Arrest was Unauthorized
9 Jul 2012, 9:34 am
People v. [read post]
New York Criminal Lawyer Blog - http://www.newyorkcriminallawyerblog.com/
Microsoft smoked in i4i case: clear and convincing evidence remains
9 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
S. 167, 174 (2001) (quoting United States v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part One: Why the U.S. Supreme Court Might Resolve the Case Even Though Its Decision Probably Won’t Affect the Colorado Presidential Primary Election Ballot
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
 Trump v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/