Search for: "A G " Results 6581 - 6600 of 63,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2007, 9:01 am
  Today, I am pleased to present the following article from Jonathan G. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Subsection (g) bars gun possession by, among others, felons, fugitives from justice, illegal aliens, violent misdemeanants, and people under domestic restraining orders. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 11:22 am by assoulineberlowe
Given the volume of federal lawsuits GS Holistic has filed in Florida this year, use of their brands G-Pen and Stündenglass are prevalent across the state. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:35 am by Francis Pileggi
 The beginning of his post is excerpted below: In November 2013, I delivered the 29th Annual Francis G. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Par conséquent, même si la caractéristique (g) n'a pas été modifiée, la modification apportée à la revendication dans son ensemble a une influence sur la détermination de la portée de la revendication en ce qui concerne le composant (g). [read post]
8 May 2023, 11:43 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Article 23 RPBA 2020).1.5.1 The Enlarged Board of Appeal set out in G 1/21 the conditions under which a party's request for in-person proceedings may be denied. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As the Board did not itself review the decision under appeal in the light of these newly admitted documents the PRP was not an issue during these first appeal proceedings. [2.3.1] As pointed out in G 1/99 [9.2] the PRP was established in G 4/93 not as a principle of procedural law generally recognised in the Contracting States (A 125), but as a consequence of the principle of ne ultra petita, more specifically “it is the appellant who in the notice of appeal determines the… [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Since the reasons for granting Swiss-form use claims had disappeared with the entry into force of EPC 2000, there was no reason to maintain the "praetorian" approach suggested in case G 0005/83, and such claims would no longer be permitted. [read post]