Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 6581 - 6600
of 9,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 7:21 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
This is not normally how settlements are done – even at the Copyright Board.The deal represents about a 50% (or even an 800% based upon the existing minimum rate) increase over the current rates, which should have gone significantly down rather than up after the 2004 CCH v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:43 am
United States, No. 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm
After arguing that the earlier case involved a different statute with different language, and explaining why the earlier decision was unpersuasive, the Court ultimately shrugged its shoulders and flatly stated that it was not bound by the 1989 decision. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
See Blackwell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:59 pm
In AK Steel Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
The Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York recently decided that a licensing agreement between a television broadcast company and the owner of an animated children’s television series was fully integrated, despite a provision in the agreement which stated that the parties would execute a more detailed long form agreement in the future. 4Kids Entm’t, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
A federal district court in South Carolina has invalidated the NLRB's rule requiring employers to post notice in the workplace informing employees of their NLRA rights (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, April 13, 2012, Norton, D). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:32 am
US and Hill v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Chief among these are Grand Upright Music v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Armisted v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
In Huppe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:48 am
L’amour, in its less savory forms, also features in State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:05 am
Once they assented to the stipulation, they were bound to strictly comply with its terms. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
The Court pointed out that in True v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:24 pm
Zulon v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:25 am
In this interesting treatment of the issue of compelling a non-party to arbitrate, In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Sunskar LTD. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
It’s true that in Republic of Ecuador v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm
We are duty-bound to seek justice, period. [read post]
