Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 6581 - 6600 of 9,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by admin
Government’s ability to transfer detainees out of Guantanamo (Secs. 1033-35). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, plaintiff's alleged discovery is simply an additional facet of the same nonfeasance of which, according to her complaint, she had been aware since November 2007; thus, it does not constitute a separate wrongful act or omission for statute of limitations purposes (see Peregrine Funding, Inc. v Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, 133 Cal App 4th 658, 685, 35 Cal Rptr 3d 31, 51 [2005]). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:34 am by CJLF Staff
" Definition of Victim Doesn't Include Next of Kin: Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle reports the California law that allows crime victims or witnesses to ask the state for a buffer zone requiring a parolee who served time for a violent crime to live at least 35 miles away does not apply to next of kin, said the Second District Court of Appeal in Los Angeles in a 2-1 ruling Friday. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
It wants a baseline survey and a "viable analytical laboratory test method" before any more testing goes forward.In the Dec. 1 teleconference, Hodges cited "enormous knowledge gaps that exist" and said there is a "lack of a solid foundation" for the new policy, which it does not think is necessary. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
§ 922(g)(1), Milot possessed a firearm and ammunition after having been convicted of a felony. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:26 am by Leslie Sammis
The patient and his or her primary caregiver were 32 collectively in possession of amounts of cannabis only as 33 permitted under this section. 34 35 This affirmative defense does not exclude the assertion of any 36 other defense by a patient or primary caregiver who is charged 37 with a violation of state law related to the patient’s medical 38 use of cannabis. 39 (b)? [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm by Daniel Sokol
  The European Court of Human Rights has held, notably in Pretty v UK (2002) 35 E.H.R.R. 1  that although such a blanket ban on assisted suicide engages Article 8 of the Convention, such a ban may be “necessary in a democratic society” for the protection of the rights of others and hence justified under Article 8(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to private and family life). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:48 am
And, in his words he doesn’t want to “borrow $1 billion from China to pay for them. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
  It does mean necessarily the top rate would be reduced from 35 percent, so that would increase long-term economic growth, but the degree to which we can't say without more specifics. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC mentioned the term "junk science":After the district court granted summary judgment in its favor, Cordis moved to have MarcTec’s suit declared exceptional under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm
 The case presents the following questions: 1) Does Romney have standing? [read post]