Search for: "U. N. N."
Results 6581 - 6600
of 7,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2014, 5:51 am
Wie wird sich das Völkerrecht im jeweiligen Forschungsfeld in den nächsten 30 Jahren verändern? [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:49 am
The court began its analysis of Fikri’s appeal by noting that the Ohio CSPA provides `[n]o supplier shall commit an unfair or deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
The scathing opinion by U. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
York U litigation. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
“They would never miss a tea, which were quite lavish back then,” recalled Edward N. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:40 am
Haimdas, 720 F.Supp.2d 183, 187 n. 1 (E.D.N.Y.2010). [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
Second, and here’s the wrong part, “[u]nderstanding exactly what services ‘Life After Hate’ provides requires a leap of imagination. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am
Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
, 162 U. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:02 pm
[O]n August 9, 2002, the State District Court revoked the suspended sentences after [he] admitted violating . . . his probation by . . . having unsupervised contact with minor children by allowing them into his home. . . . [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:08 am
Inresponse, Michelle suggested that she drive her car from Canada and Burhan drive a "U-haul" (rental vehicle) around October 18 or 19. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:31 am
, U. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm
“[I]n context, it seems to us that FIU operates in a crowded field of similar names. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
., 128 U. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:34 am
” An SPI internal marketing document states that “[t]he correct full name is: elit by Stolichnaya” and instructs, “[n]ever use: elit by Stoli, or Stoli elit. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
The Court in Buckman did not address express preemption, 531 U.S. at 348 n.2, and instead based its decision on implied preemption, finding that nothing about the former could preclude the latter:Respondent also suggests that we should be reluctant to find a pre-emptive conflict here because Congress included an express pre-emption provision in the MDA. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:42 am
Juni 2015 vollständig vorgelegen hatten.Die Voraussetzungen für die Umschreibung betreffend den Antrag der Dritten waren jedoch unstreitig bereits zuvor, nämlich am 10. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
As Wikipedia explains, [i]n the United States, removal jurisdiction refers to the right of a defendant to move a lawsuit filed in state court to the federal district court for the federal judicial district in which the state court sits. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:59 am
Turning to the proper remedy, the court explained, quoting the FVRA, that “[u]nder the FVRA’s vacant-office provision, if a person is not lawfully serving in conformity with the FVRA, ‘[a]n action taken’ by that person ‘in the performance of any function or duty of [the] vacant office … shall have no force or effect’ and ‘may not be ratified. [read post]
