Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 6601 - 6620 of 112,788
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2009, 7:18 am
Simply using a drug-sniffing dog during an otherwise lawful traffic stop does not implicate a defendant's legitimate privacy interests. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 7:35 pm by Donald Thompson
For whatever reason, the defendant does not serve notice of his intention to testify and does not testify before the PH. [read post]
Assault charges can result in substantial penalties, but simply because someone is charged with assault does not mean that the State can obtain a conviction. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:08 am by Tung Yin
  So presumably the same principle applies -- the Justice Department must defend it. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Neither the two motions by the defendant nor the two responses filed by the district attorney appear on the court's docket. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Circuit also says it does not matter that defendants had to cancel their vacation in order to remain at the house during the search. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 8:09 am by Admin
  Please note that the authorization does not give the defendant permission to inquire about all matters of the plaintiff’s health, only those relevant to the plaintiff’s cause of action. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:00 pm
The Supreme Court decided to pursue the third option, finding that federal law does not require each defendant to pay the full amount of restitution. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(…)The defendant objects to Topics 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 17 in large part because the plaintiff seeks fact-specific information that is normally elicited by means other than a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition since such information does not relate to the defendant's corporate position. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Judge Judy explained that either he is a partner and does not get a 1099 or he is not a partner. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 12:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
 Defendants contend she was pronounced clinically brain dead. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:46 am
In a world with more internet access I'd do a quick study, but for now, I'll just pose the question:When an opinion begins by saying that a plaintiff "injured herself" (or himself) in a particular accident, does that tend to suggest that the Court of Appeal is going to find for the defendant? [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 11:40 am
The defendants were found guilty in the Eastern District of New York and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:50 am by Federalist Society
This case considered whether judicial participation in plea negotiation, in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1), automatically requires the vacating of a subsequent guilty plea--regardless of whether the violation prejudiced the defendant.By a vote of 9-0 the Court held, per an opinion by Justice Ginsburg, judicial participation in violation of Rule 11(c)(1) does not require that a defendant’s guilty plea be vacated if the record shows no prejudice to the… [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:33 pm by Sme
Colorado State Public Defender (10th Cir., August 4, 2017) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the public defender on Lucas's race, sexual discrimination, retaliation, equal protection, and interference with a post-employment opportunity)Miscellaneous*Star Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:30 am
Federal Appeals Court Does Not See Fraud By Hindsight Investors sued a biotech company and its CEO amid claims that the defendants had issued press releases that fraudulently under-stated the timeframes to begin and complete FDA trials. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:20 am by Docket Navigator
"Defendant directed the Court to Plaintiff’s application for a reissue patent for the [patent] to rebut the presumption that the [patent-in-suit] is valid. . . . [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
The USDC for the Eastern District of Tennessee recently ruled that the Sixth Circuit’s settlement privilege does not prevent a non-settling defendant from obtaining the settlement agreement between a plaintiff and a settling defendant. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 5:46 am by David A. Beatty
  Servidone, like K2, involved an insurer that breached its duty to defend, a subsequent demand to indemnify, and an argument that a claim was not within a policy's coverage. [read post]