Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 17,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
The general prohibition on unilateral uses of force does not mean that, when confronted with another state’s annoying or unlawful conduct, a victim state’s hands are tied. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:16 am
Cir. 2017) The district court awarded summary judgment to the defendant — finding the asserted claims invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:43 am
Cir. 2015) and hold that judicial review is available for a patent owner to challenge the PTO’s determination that the petitioner satisfied the timeliness requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
China does not have a comprehensive law or regulations relating to the collection, processing or transfer of employee data gathered by a WFOE or other business entity in the normal course of its China business operations and China’s new cybersecurity law does not change that situation. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
Cleveland, 67 Ohio St.3d 35 (1993) (The Ohio Constitution is a document of independent force.) [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 9:45 am
Does this spell the end of surveys based on self-reported data? [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 5:55 am
Iovino, a 35 year old executive assistant for a private equity firm, missed one week of work after the accident, then lost her job but returned to a similar job a month after her surgery and at trial was still working there. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 10:14 am
Specifically, thedistrict court concluded that the term “visually negligible”rendered the asserted claims indefinite under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
This eligibility does not serve as a basis for decreasing their entitlement to benefits. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 7:04 am
Following a dismissal for lack of patentable subject matter, the court denied defendant's motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:38 am
In another successful cancellation proceeding, the Board confirmed that the U.S. distributor of a product was the owner of the mark in question, not the foreign manufacturer who made the product to petitioner’s order.Finally, another fraud claim bit the dust as the Board rejected a petitioner’s allegation due to its failure to prove an intention to deceive the USPTO when respondent, in its underlying application, made its allegedly false declaration regarding the lack of third-party… [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:28 am
He was 35!!! [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 10:00 pm
This does not mean that the use of broadening terms such as "substantially"are bad in all instances, the drafter must simply be careful to adequately describe and provide sufficient details in the specification to define the term for those skilled in the art. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:04 pm
It fails to mention that IPSO does not comply with the Leveson recommendations. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 12:20 pm
Combs, 49 Cal. 4th 35 (2020), or the common law test set forth in S.G. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:13 am
The state or city is often aware that a road or intersection is unusually dangerous and does nothing about it. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:12 am
Isn’t there anything progressive he actually does? [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:31 am
Colorado does not. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:11 am
Opposer pointed to the similarity in trade dress used by the parties, the Board noting that although it does not ordinarily look to trade dress for word marks (since the trade dress may be changed at any time), trade dress nonetheless may provide evidence as to whether the marks project confusingly similar commercial impressions. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 5:07 pm
However, does not work significant overtime throughout the year. [read post]
