Search for: "In re Grant"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 33,911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 5:23 am
A lawyer has no obligation to file frivolous motions, but frivolous doesn’t mean “likely to lose,” it means not having any basis in law or fact, and few motions to withdraw a plea fall into that category, given that they’re supposed to be “liberally and freely granted. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:26 am
If you have experienced military sexual assault, you’re not alone. [read post]
14 May 2025, 5:46 am
Funding options include: Grants: Organizations like the Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP) and Disability:IN offer funding or partner with grant-making entities. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:07 am
And they’re not students. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 1:48 pm
” In re Sealed Case, 310 F.3d at 742-45. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 3:00 pm
Back Payments: Until an official modification is granted, you’re expected to continue payments. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 3:46 am
In vacating a plea, as in life, timing is everything: if you file the motion before you’re sentenced, it’s to be granted “liberally” (although it usually doesn’t work out that way in practice), but if you wait until after you’re sentenced, you have to show a “manifest injustice” warrants vacating the plea, and good luck with that. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 5:02 am
No one says you can’t begin investigating the moment you’re retained or assigned. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
But on March 9, the Court granted review in Hurst v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:09 am
No, we’re not talking about the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:35 am
Post-grant review (...)A petition for a post-grant review shall be filed not later than 9 months after the grant of the patent or issuance of a reissue patent. (...)would demonstrate that it is more likely than not that at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable. (...)The determination re- quired under subsection (a) may also be satisfied by a showing that the petition raises a novel or unsettled legal question that is important to other… [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:15 pm
Even in a default judgment case, you still have to show you’re entitled to damages Even after the judge grants a default judgment in your favor, your case isn’t over yet. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:00 am
” Leaves to Appeal Granted Aboriginal Law: Duty to Consult Canada (Governor General in Council) v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:15 am
This is because K-1 visa holders cannot work until they’ve been granted permanent legal status. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:42 am
If you’re wondering why this is still important and crucial in 2016. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:57 am
In re American Express, at *17. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
Grant Thornton LLP v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:24 pm
The motion to re-argue and to reinstate the sixth count of the indictment is granted. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
But overall, IPR has been a big step forward for limiting the damage of wrongly granted patents. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:42 am
(see http://www.ailf.org/lac/pa/lac_pa_fraudwaiver.pdf) However, if you re-apply for admission and are denied, it is possible that a 212 might be available…but that is the instance where admittance is denied based on the fraud, you and re-open the marriage fraud allegation with the intent to retry the underlying issue (in this case, the BIA has held that when reviewing a subsequent request regarding the marriage fraud, the review must be taken anew and must be a substantial… [read post]
