Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2017, 4:02 am
If they keep the employee on the job, it’s likely considered negligent retention of an employee, for which the employer may be liable for any subsequent harm. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:31 pm
It is undisputed that the sheriff’s department was not served an ante litem notice. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:57 pm
Obviously that’s a distinction without a difference in this case, which involves multiple defendants. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:31 pm
It is undisputed that the sheriff’s department was not served an ante litem notice. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 9:49 am
Finally, the Fourth Circuit addressed whether Dish could be held liable for SSN’s unwanted calls, a question that turned on whether SSN was acting as Dish’s agent when it made the calls. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Under comparative fault principles, however, these defendants are jointly and severally liable only for that percentage of the plaintiff’s damages caused by the product. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 3:44 am
But don't let lay juries, in the presence of an injured plaintiff, decide after the fact whether the product manufacturer should be held liable for either -- take your pick -- giving too few warnings or giving too many.If Mark Lanier's argument is as overlawyered.com describes it, that's this week's sign that the apocalypse is upon us. [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:00 am
Only if the court finds the defendant liable, will the second phase take place. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 3:50 am
”Highsmith says that Getty is liable for statutory damages of up to $468,875,000.Getty commented "We are reviewing the complaint. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
Can a patentee be liable to a public health authority for the tort of causing loss by unlawful means, as a result of making misleading or dishonest representations to the EPO/Court as to the validity of a patent? [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 3:40 pm
“If you find that Defendant Jamie Paliath committed fraud with respect to the sale of [properties] to Plaintiff Torri Auer, then Defendant Keller Williams Hometown Realty of Vandalia is vicariously liable and you must find in favor of Plaintiff Torri Auer and against Defendant Keller Williams Hometown Realty of Vandalia * * *” In her opinion, Justice French notes juror confusion on this key point. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:10 pm
The purpose of a trial is to determine whether the defendant is liable for the accident in question, not an incident that occurred years ago. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 5:23 pm
The bill would also allow the defendant’s legal team to interview anyone who treated the plaintiff after the defendant without telling the plaintiff’s attorney or the plaintiff about the interview. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:07 pm
The two new Indiana copyright infringement complaints assert that Defendants did not comply with these licensing requirements and are, consequently, liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 8:19 am
You may be entitled to compensation if your injury or your loved one’s death involved the following factors: The defendant owed you or your loved one a duty of care. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 1:25 pm
On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, noted the only way the defendants could be liable for negligence would be if Hughes-Berg established the existence of a "special relationship. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:09 pm
The Superior Court held that plaintiffs provided services to all the defendants by selling cars under the dealership and parent company’s name. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:09 pm
The Superior Court held that plaintiffs provided services to all the defendants by selling cars under the dealership and parent company’s name. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:34 pm
Commonly, you’ll hear of a defendant being acquitted in a criminal trial using a beyond a reasonable doubt standard yet, he or she can be found liable for damages under a preponderance of the evidence standard. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
Unocal, for example, the Ninth Circuit in 2002 confirmed that Unocal could be liable for aiding and abetting violations of international law committed by the Burmese military in connection with the construction of a pipeline in Burma. [read post]
