Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 10,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2013, 7:30 am
As Harms points out, a failure to obtain exchange approval, will not render the “transaction” void. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
By Misa Bretschneider Last Wednesday marked another chapter in the clash between 3D printing and copyright law. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:50 pm
The mirror had no marks or damage. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178-79 (alterations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted). (...)One factor that weighs in favor of sealing documents is when the release of the documents will cause competi- tive harm to a business. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 2:14 pm
With about 30 seconds of wi-fi, here are my two cents on top of Mark's and Stephen's. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 2:01 pm
The perception of the IP world appears to be largely negative in the public sphere, as something which protects big business and harms the little man. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 7:15 am
However, that argument missed the mark because the ultimate issue was whether the employer acted based on her gender, not whether her conduct should have been treated as violating the employer’s policy. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:27 am
The extent of harm caused by the plaintiff is relevant, but the defendant need not show prejudice. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
Not every mark left on a child resulted from child abuse. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 10:20 am
Ct. at 2471 (regulatory citation and quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
An other-than-serious violation is one that has a direct relationship to job safety and health, but probably would not cause death or serious physical harm. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:06 am
Vargas had a relationship marked with acts of physical violence and verbal abuse. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
.); torts teaches both the substantive law of civil wrongs (and common law reasoning) and the policy contexts in which our society determines its choices for allocating risk and responsibility for actions that produce remediable harm. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:53 am
Such a loss of market share to an infringer was cited as a textbook example of irreparable harm which, in turn, supported the injunction. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:50 am
Mark Lemley, Why Do Juries Decide If Patents Are Valid? [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:34 am
” So, when commencing negotiations, drop anchor, but do it with care, lest you do more harm than good. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
Mark Eibert, Half Moon Bay, California, for Defendant-Appellant. 4. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:18 am
Seltzer v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:51 am
Placing Elkin-Koren’s work next to Breyer’s, it is plain to see that the harmful economic and cultural effects of our current copyright regime are more visible and more harmful than ever. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
(One risk, it seems to me, is that nations will decide “we want trademark owners to have rights to protect the dignity and reputation of their marks, however insulted or harmed”; having done so, that’s about it for free speech defenses.) [read post]
