Search for: "State v Smith" Results 6601 - 6620 of 11,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2013, 3:50 pm by Jeff Gittins
In 2011, the Utah Supreme Court issued the Jensen v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm by Christa Culver
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 11:25 am
  Ms Joanna Smith QC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court was faced with a similar argument as Huawei's and ZTE's in Vannin Capital PCC v RBOS Shareholders Action Group Limited [2019] EWHC 1617 (Ch). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
 | Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
Here's another guest post by Reed Smith's own Kevin Hara, this time about a recent Texas case holding that health care providers involved in clinical trials are still protected by a state medical malpractice statute, and thus were fraudulently joined. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Smith, supra, at 462–63; see also Azure Networks, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:14 am by Jeff Welty
The Court had agreed to review a New Orleans case that presented the issue of whether Miller v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
Clark's April 27th execution date because there was sufficient evidence that the State of Texas may have misapplied Atkins v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:05 am by Gabriel Meister
Regardless of the outcome, Barshack v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:04 pm by Giles Peaker
The Admin Court considered Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood [2004] UKHL 14 as a foundation of Smith. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:10 pm
Think of the elderly, as Scalia did in his surely-by-now-regretted dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]