Search for: "US Inventor"
Results 6601 - 6620
of 7,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2025, 10:23 am
Patents grant inventors exclusive rights to their inventions for a limited period, providing a crucial competitive advantage. [read post]
Bilski v. Kappos: SCOTUS Doesn't Recognize Business Methods Patents But Doesn't Prohibit Them Either
28 Jun 2010, 12:07 pm
Francis, Financial Accounting: An Introduction to Concepts, Methods, and Uses 581–582 (13th ed. 2010); S.Ross, R. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
IP lawyers usually deal with patents that protect inventors’ rights and keep copycat competitors at bay during the time period the patent is valid. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:35 pm
The objective was to use the technical possibilities of expert systems to enable retrieval, with the use of suitable dialogues and arguments, local legal texts, especially the legislation of the Aragón Autonomous Region. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
There is no such thing as a second inventor, but there is a second author as long as they both drew the works out of themselves. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Fair use presupposes good faith. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
SEB, S.A (Maier & Maier) US Copyright Fair use for poetry: Best practices for parody, satire, remixes, epigraphs and other uses (IP Osgoode) US Copyright – Decisions 7th Circuit: No copyright, moral rights in flower gardens under VARA: Chapman Kelly v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 11:07 am
Retiring in Piriápolis, Uruguay Piriapolis was established in 1890 by Francisco Piria, a Uruguayan inventor and businessman of Italian descent. [read post]
16 May 2010, 7:41 pm
USTR writes that rights holders have raised a number of concerns, including the effect of disclosure or origin requirements on patent validity (rightly so, because it is unclear), inventor remuneration (no reason for this fear, see 'Are Statutory Compensation Rules for Inventors Scary? [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
As discussed above, patent prosecutors, inventors, courts, and the public at large have an interest in reining in inequitable conduct. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
Shipley, the inventor of the ’236 patent (“Shipley Declaration”), and F. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 8:46 am
Fina Oil, 123 F.3d at 1473 (“The determinationof whether a person is a joint inventor is fact specific, andno bright-line standard will suffice in every case. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
[Update] Heise online, Germany's leading information & communications technology news website, has a great headline: it translates literally as "Federal Parliament puts pebbles [using the diminutive of "stones"] in patent trolls' way. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:11 am
Cir. 2020) (finding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in reaching its inequitable conduct determination where the district court concluded that the inventors and their lawyers made a deliberate decision to withhold material information from the USPTO regarding an offer for sale and reduction to practice of the claimed invention that would have implicated an on-sale bar) The Notice cites several Supreme Court decisions for the proposition that an attempt to conceal relevant… [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:41 pm
“[T]he standard of one reasonablyskilled in the art should be used to determine whether thehost document describes the material to be incorporatedby reference with sufficient particularity. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:47 am
” Second, imposing the use of a bed frame in claim 1 improperly imports a limitation into the claim from a preferred embodiment.Id. at *11 (internal citations omitted).Claim Differentiation[C]onvincingly, claim 10 (which depends from claims 1 and 9) is explicitly limited to the “bed frame” embodiment envisioned by the district court. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:12 am
It provides the JVT with information about the patent status of techniques used in or proposed for incorporation in a recommendation or standard. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:21 am
Therefore, AIA § 6(f)(3)(C) and TCA § 1(k)(3)together make clear that pre-AIA § 146 review was eliminatedfor interference proceedings declared after September15, 2012.The specific provisions in § 6(f)(3)(C) and § 1(k)(3)require us to apply the basic tenet of statutory interpretationthat the specific governs the general. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:09 pm
Cartner is Motrim’s president and the named inventor of the ’284 patent. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 11:13 am
Inventor, Inc. v. [read post]
