Search for: "California v. Law" Results 6621 - 6640 of 33,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2020, 6:06 am by John Elwood
California, 19-532 Issue: Whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigration authorities with release dates and other information about individuals subject to federal immigration enforcement, and restrict the transfer of aliens in state custody to federal immigration custody, are preempted by federal law or barred by intergovernmental immunity. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:58 am by INFORRM
It tried a similar approach in Canada in what is by now quite a well-known case, Google v Equustek. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:45 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
California, Illinois, Colorado, Florida, and Massachusetts rounded out the top 50%, each with between 6% and 9% of total cases. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 7:13 pm by Bryn Miller
This shared wisdom piece was first published in 2011 in Vol. 34, No. 1 of the California Public Law Journal, a quarterly publication of the Public Law Section of the State Bar of California. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:21 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Harbor Drive, San Diego, California, Terminal 2, Curbside Entrance V Phone number: (619) 491-2680 Hours of Operation: Monday through Friday 12 PM-3 PM Applicants must provide: Original passport plus copy of biodata page Page with ESTA entry stamp I-94 record Copy of initial travel itinerary Proof of cancelled flight Proof of residency outside the US (e.g., lease, utility bill, pay statement, etc.) [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:23 am by Richard Hunt
Like some, but not all, federal courts in California this one was willing to dismiss state law claims as predominating over federal claims but not an ADA claim that was adequately pleaded. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
City of Bakersfield, California v. [read post]