Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 6621 - 6640 of 16,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2007, 6:59 am
One point of debate was an issue on which Whelan and Judge Michael McConnell have written: Is there an originalist case for Brown v Bd of Ed? [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 2:14 pm by Robin Shea
” When a court determines whether a government agency’s interpretation of a statute is valid, the  court applies the Supreme Court’s two-step analysis in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
It was hoped that the decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) of the EPO in G 2/21 would bring clarity. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by Cary Coglianese
With the federal government’s receding role on climate change, subnational governments may offer the only meaningful hope for the United States to make significant policy progress. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
 Katfriends Morag MacDonald (Bird & Bird, left), Richard Vary (Nokia), Sally Field (Bristows) and the eponymous Mehmet Gün are there too, not to mention EPLAW Honorary President Pierre Véron, Margot Fröhlinger (all the way from Eponia), knowledgeable Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), the dashing Justin Turner QC and, well, you can see for yourself who else is there ... [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 1:51 pm by Brendan Kevenides
  Our state's appellate court did Illinois bicyclists a solid with its holding in Pattullo-Banks v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:30 am
  So what can possibly be at issue in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am by Kelly Goles
Additionally, he intervened in the state’s mental health institutions attempting to remedy their ills in Wyatt v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-632, Turner v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 3:06 pm
The second case on appeal is the Electronic Frontier Foundation's case against AT&T, known as Hepting v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 6:52 am by Dennis Crouch
” Feliciano asserts that the word “during” simply denotes a temporal connection, not a substantive one, citing United States v. [read post]