Search for: "In re R. F." Results 6621 - 6640 of 10,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Charlesworth: you need to explain things to fourth graders why this is illegal [I note that I have never been able to do this w/r/t 1201!] [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 5:08 pm by Daniel Schwartz
I’ve previously discussed the changing rules in some prior posts here and here, so you should catch up there first if this is the first time you’re hearing about it. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:47 am by Jeff Nowak
They’re good to go, and they almost certainly will go unchanged for another three years. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:34 pm by Nikki Siesel
See In re Robert Simmons, Inc., 192 U.S.P.Q. 331 1976 WL 21133 (TTAB 1976) where it was held that WHITE SABLE was not deceptive of an artist’s paint brush. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:17 am by Doug Cornelius
., Exchange Act Release No. 7329, 1964 SEC LEXIS 513, at *59 (June 2, 1964), aff’d on other grounds, 348 F.2d 798 (D.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 5:20 am by Dave Wieneke
We’re living in a time in which the boxes used to organize people are broken, and ever  less useful. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:12 am by Will Aitchison
., 493 F.3d 454, 460 (4th Cir.2007) (citing D.A. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:04 am by Brad Pauley
Markham (2d Cir. 1945) 148 F.2d 737, 739; see also In re David V. (2010) 48 Cal.4th 23, 27 [rejecting Oxford English Dictionary’s definition of “wear” as partially inconsistent with “modern American usage”].) [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:52 am by Erik Weibust
  Specifically, Judge Hillman found that AMD’s allegations were insufficient to sustain a CFAA claim under a narrow interpretation of the statute, but permitted AMD to re-plead specific details indicating that some or all of the defendants used fraudulent or deceptive means to obtain confidential AMD information, and/or that they intentionally defeated or circumvented technologically implemented restrictions to obtain confidential AMD information. [read post]
13 May 2016, 5:41 am by Joy Waltemath
” Of note: the HR director’s statements “were part of the res gestae of the already-found violations” including unlawful interference and unlawful discipline (a separate 8(a)(3) violation), and would “clearly dissuade” the employee from talking about her prior protected activity (discussing the union election with coworkers). [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
Instead, they're considered more of an investor since they purchased the mortgages as part of a securities package. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:40 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
You cannot remarry in any of the years you’re filing as a qualifying widow(er) with dependent child (if you remarry, file as married with your new spouse) and you must have a child for whom you can claim an exemption. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 10:55 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
If you’re looking for your tax refund, the IRS strongly suggests that you use the “Where’s My Refund? [read post]