Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 6621 - 6640 of 10,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2013, 3:55 am
 Here the complainant had earlier common law rights to the mark DESIGN FIRST for construction-related services, while the registrant had adopted the mark DESIGN 1st /FIRST for various product design services. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:33 am
  An action for dilution can assert either, or both, of two principal harms: blurring and tarnishment. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:52 pm by Afro Leo
The campaign demonstrates the potential for the economic loss to be simply, the recognition that harm could be caused to the advertising or investment function of the brand which takes a considerable amount of time and money to develop. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:34 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The prosecution, led by Army Brigadier General Mark Martins, asserts that the RDI program remains properly classified for legitimate reasons of national security, but it is very difficult to evaluate the credibility of this claim because the briefs supporting the need for closed sessions are themselves classified. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:37 am by Ron Coleman
., harmful to the plaintiff’s ability to compete with the defendant”). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:37 am by Ron Coleman
., harmful to the plaintiff’s ability to compete with the defendant”). [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 5:33 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
While I’m hopeful that most pieces are around the 300-600 word mark, you can write up to 1200 words. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:40 am by Michael Markarian
“This bipartisan legislation will help stop abusive tactics that deliberately harm horses, and I’m pleased to see that the bill has broad support among animal cruelty prevention organizations. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:00 am by Cari Rincker
Plant Industry:  This government division works with plant health by preventing the spread of disease and harmful invasive species. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:51 am by Jim Sedor
Emergency rules that will become permanent in August allow the commission to exempt donors that face “harm, threats, harassment, or reprisals” if it became known they were contributing to a cause. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
Indeed, the HD and Standard Definition options are clearly marked on iTunes. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 12:58 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Those factors are: Detail Behind Mark: The detail of the image behind the mark is crucial. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:30 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
    Exclamation Mark:  A red diamond with an explanation mark is to warn employees the product can be an irritant (skin or eye), skin sensitizer, acute toxicity (harmful), narcotic effects, respiratory tract irritant, hazardous to the ozone layer (non-mandatory). [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:35 am by John L. Welch
KCG IP Holdings LLC, Cancellation No. 92055228 (July 10, 2013) [not precedential].The theory behind the Morehouse defense is that one party cannot be harmed by the issuance to, or existence of a registration of, a second party if the second party already owns a registration for essentially the same mark for essentially the same goods or services. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 11:25 am by Joe Consumer
  Writes the Coalition for Sensible Safeguards,   This bill represents the most radical threat to our government’s ability to protect the public from harm in generations. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:40 am by Schachtman
More recently, David Allison and Mark Cope, two public health researchers described[2] white-hat bias as a prevalent cognitive bias in how research is reported and interpreted. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:42 pm
API claims that Bullseye's use of the marks will irreparably harm API and, further, will harm the public by causing engine damage or failure. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Column was marked as "Correspondence" and titled, "You're a Mean One, Mr. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:06 am by Daniel Richardson
By David RangavizIn re Kimmick, 2013 VT 43Today’s case is about the scope of the right to counsel.This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Gideon v. [read post]