Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 22,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2019, 7:15 am
The Senate has not adopted standard rules of evidence to be used during an impeachment trial. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 2:56 pm
Alternatively, one might think of eliminating the the 43% DTI cap, which would make the GSE Patch of relatively little importance, so its lapse would not matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Oracle's motion for judgment as a matter of law on copyrightability is improper because Rule 50 does not apply to issues decided by the Court. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 11:47 am
The rule is fairly conventional. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
White also expressed her expectation that the Commission will consider the need for transitional guidance for ongoing offerings that commenced before the effective date of any final rules, as it did when it adopted Rule 506(c) last summer. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 3:11 am
Litigants should expect the enforcement of foreign judgments to be the rule rather than an exception. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:48 am
But most states do not do this.Nor is it correct that the Rome Statute prohibits such a rule of liability: as I note at pages 193 to 194 in my monograph on the Court (The International Criminal Court and the Transformation of International Law (2002), which, of course, is not cited by the majority), the Rome Statute is simply silent on the question because there was no clear consensus.I take issue with the majority’s review of the travaux préparatoires – having been at… [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
A majority of states have adopted either the 1962 version of the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act, or its 2005 update. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
For more on this issue, see my 2014 post, Two district courts adopt the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:50 pm
Thus, the City argues that First DCA’s ruling directly conflicted with Hadley and Oswald. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:11 am
Here, the majority adopted Kagan’s reasoning, “as has every Court of Appeals ruling on the issue post Genesis HealthCare,” it noted. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm
Here, the majority adopted Kagan’s reasoning, “as has every Court of Appeals ruling on the issue post Genesis HealthCare,” it noted. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 1:05 pm
However, due to the anonymous nature of the blogger involved the majority of the court declined to adopt jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 pm
He also adopted the rationale for it as set out inMcDonald v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:05 pm
More broadly, their empirical analysis is an important platform for future scholarship about the proper policy to adopt on matters of regulatory diffusion.The post Analyzing Regulatory Diffusion first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
Forrest found that the plaintiffs' notice was untimely and their delay was inexcusable as a matter of law. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 5:23 pm
Foster Parents filed termination of parental rights (TPR) and adoption actions, and subsequently sought to intervene in the removal actions and sought to consolidate the removal and TPR/adoptions actions. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:29 am
We have written law telling us that these matters need to be expedited. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
In 1977, the House adopted a rule change that allowed individual committees to, if they wished, delegate the power to issue subpoenas to the chairman alone, without the need to consult the full committee. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Questioning another person’s sincerity is a serious matter, and courts would prefer not to be forced to rule that a person really does not believe in the religious proposition that he has claimed—on public record, no less—to believe. [read post]
