Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 6621 - 6640 of 13,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
The moving defendant’s burden is to demonstrate that the act or acts of which the plaintiff complains were taken ‘in furtherance of the defendant’s right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue,’ as defined in the statute. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
When a DACA recipient who has been unlawfully present in the United States for a lengthy period of time leaves the United States to apply for an employment-based visa at a U.S. consulate abroad, they are likely to trigger the 3- or 10-year bars pursuant to INA § 212(a)(9)(B).Under INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) a person who is unlawfully present for more than 180 days but less than 1 year, and who voluntarily departs the US prior to the commencement of… [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am by John Elwood
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:32 pm
Barring convicted sex offenders from having family-based petitions approved.TITLE V--CHILD PORNOGRAPHY PREVENTIONSec. 501. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 3:40 am
" On the other hand, consumers would perceive respondent’s Red, White and Blue Fence Post Mark as referring to "the national colors of the United States of America, or the flag of the United States of America. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 3:15 am by Marta Requejo
New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:01 pm by Kali Borkoski
United States, both argued in November, are still undecided as well. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court pointed out that the DOL’s case would depend on the information received from 150 other state employees who had consented to the disclosure of their identities, and that the state employer already had this information in its possession (Perez v United States District Court, Tacoma, April 18, 2014, Trott, S). [read post]