Search for: "1-8 Doe"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 32,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2023, 8:55 pm
Under s36(1) of the Copyright Act,2 a person who is not, and does not have a licence from, the copyright owner, and does not themselves engage in an infringing act, can nevertheless be found to infringe copyright if they authorised the infringing act. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 6:29 am
”[8] But what does “plain language” mean exactly if an individual enters a complex legal agreement – does the complexity of such a contract render the “consent” invalid? [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:11 pm
Id.8. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 8:55 pm
Under s36(1) of the Copyright Act,2 a person who is not, and does not have a licence from, the copyright owner, and does not themselves engage in an infringing act, can nevertheless be found to infringe copyright if they authorised the infringing act. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:57 am
Dan Mach is a summer associate at Sive, Paget & Riesel, PC. [1] 42 U.S.C. 7408(a)(1) and 7409(b). [2] 73 Fed. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
The judicial pecking order does not permit little peckers to overrule big peckers. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
According to Reuters, the storm was expected to dump between 8 and 12 inches of rain over Hispaniola, the island shared by the Dominican Republic and Haiti. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
Judge Titus noted that the EEOC's credit check data covered 1/1/05-10/13/08 while the EEOC's claims covered the period of 3/23/07-8/11/11. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 8:02 am
Claus does have a question on e-signature requirements (which was a recurring theme in the e-mails and comments - see below). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
The AG has advised the CJEU to rule that the German Government failed to notify the Commission as required for a 'technical regulation' under Article 8(1) of Directive 98/34, and that such failure to comply with this obligation means that the right is unenforceable. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:02 pm
Normal incidence is implicit, since equation (2) in claim 1 does not contain a factor depending on the angle. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
Appellants filed their revised brief on June 1, 2021 in which they argue that the FTC does not have the authority to impose some of the remedies that the FTC has imposed. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 5:46 am
The Circuit Court reasoned that a “handshake” is not a “sale,” so for purposes of Section 2101(b)(1) the sale did not occur until January 8, 2004. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
The right to discovery does NOT depend on the status of the pleadings. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:12 pm
What, it is sometimes wondered, does a claim under the DPA add which is not already covered by claims under Article 8, defamation and so on? [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:30 am
If the negotiated agreement fulfils the conditions and requirements referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission shall, within 90 days of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 1, give a reasoned decision on the application of the Member State authorising it to conclude that agreement. .- If, on the basis of its assessment under Article 8(2), the Commission intends not to authorise the conclusion of the negotiated agreement, it shall give an opinion to the… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:44 am
To try and think about this, consider the following cases: 1. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
A $1 million account earning 8% for 11 years will grow to $2,331,639. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
The company can and does act only through the Board. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
The right to discovery does NOT depend on the status of the pleadings. [read post]