Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 156,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:35 pm
United States (jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims)Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
Claims of Judiciary Law 487 were not. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 5:28 am
Miller (University of Cincinnati College of Law) has posted State DOMAs, Neutral Principles, and the Mobius of State Action (Temple Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg – Florida Supreme Court Rejects Another Part of Workers’ Comp Law
29 Jun 2016, 1:37 pm
Additional Resources: Westphal v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:11 am
If you think that state courts are the preferred forum, you'll probably think differently. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:58 am
It's nice, in litigation to have a ruling early on that the state of the art defense applies as a matter of law on a date certain - if you're a defendant, that is.Dr. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
By Bradley Graveline and Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:00 am
State Policy v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 103 AD3d 1009 [3d Dept 2013]; Matter of Empire Ctr. for N.Y. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 8:24 am
” Based on the record before it and applicable law, the Court concludes that Reed administered the Account under color of state law as an official governmental account. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 5:35 am
FileName=/docketfiles/11-889.htmNo. 11-889Title:Tarrant Regional Water District, Petitioner v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 1:10 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada discussed the law pertaining to setting aside a domestic agreement in its recent judgment Rick v. [read post]
11 Dec 2003, 6:21 am
In the US law and business press Thursday, the Recorder reports that in its first order in response to the US Supreme Court's ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:25 am
Interesting case.6-25-2010 Indiana:Although state law allows police to request identification from passengers inside a car that they’ve stopped, two Indianapolis officers shouldn’t have arrested a man for refusing to identify himself when there was no reasonable suspicion he’d done anything wrong.The Indiana Court of Appeals addressed that issue in a six-page opinion today in Adam Starr v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:18 am
Joined by Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:52 am
Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson says the United States should rethink the notion that a president must enforce laws the Supreme Court declares constitutional. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:42 am
See Craig v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:58 pm
[JURIST] The Illinois Supreme Court [official website] on Thursday declared one of the nation's harshest eavesdropping laws unconstitutional, stating the law was severely broad and violated basic free speech rights. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm
Washington (Indian Gaming Compact - "Most-favored Tribe")* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlEagleman v. [read post]
