Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 13,727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm
By quantum entanglement, physicists generally mean a state where two particles, either because of how they were generated or how they have engaged, become a system such that action on one particle affects the other, no matter what the other’s location.[10] Personal data has this quality as well. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:46 am
Stackpole, 104 F.2d 306 (2d Cir., June 9 1939)]. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:30 am
T. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:20 am
Dep't of Navy, 785 F.2d 286 (U.S. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
Amending the petition later won't do. [read post]
10 May 2015, 2:10 pm
In the light with the recent ECJ case law, the possible attribution of international jurisdiction to the courts of the investor’s domicile is examined; either under the applicable forum over consumer contracts, the forum of special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract, or in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:59 pm
The Decedent was a passionate collector of pre–1800 materials relating to festivals, or “fêtes,” and had been engaged in assembling the Collection for many years, beginning before his marriage. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:26 pm
AT&T (Fed. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:03 pm
Kaplan, 904 F.2d 14, 15 (8th Cir. 1990). [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:02 pm
Smith, 578 F.2d 1197, 1205 (7th Cir. 1978) (likewise); Tollett v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
Togus Reg’l Office, Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 294 F. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
Today’s decision rules that the text of Section 215 does not authorize the program as a matter of statutory law. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:00 am
At the Law Office of Nathaniel F. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:55 pm
Jim and John like the f word but aren’t so big on punctuation. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:32 am
Turk, 526 F.2d 654 (U.S. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” In re Shurley, 115 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 1997), citing G. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” In re Shurley, 115 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 1997), citing G. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:27 pm
Davis En BancIn a decision that didn’t much matter for the individual defendant but mattered greatly for how law enforcement goes about its business in today’s technological age, the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
Nor does the time-period of the records collection matter under what seems to be a mosaic theory claim: [R]easonable expectations of privacy under the Fourth Amendment do not turn on the quantity of non-content information MetroPCS collected in its historical cell tower location records. [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:20 am
[The petitioner] neither analyzes whether the [earlier provisional application] discloses the subject matter recited in the challenged claims nor provides a copy of the [provisional application] for the record in this proceeding. . . . [read post]
