Search for: "Patently Yours"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2007, 12:02 am
Don't miss this convenient opportunity for a quick overview of the findings and to find out how these findings relate to your business. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:19 am
Moreover, our law firm prioritizes quality niche content as part of its online marketing efforts.How many posts exist on your blog? [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:02 pm
The has been a rise in fraudulent schemes targeting trademark applicants and owners, which is not surprising given the record number of applications being submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:36 am
The USPTO will never ask for your personal or payment information over the phone. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 1:17 pm
There are still a few dates available to host Blawg Review, so if there's a date that is especially important for you and your blog, please send us an email telling us about it and we'll reserve that day for you.Workplace Prof Blog (which just passed 1,000,000 page views) hosted Blawg Review #73 on Labor Day. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:00 pm
specs on tesla's model 3 leaked. not too shabby. https://t.co/sX74M7ji9T 2017-05-26 british airways experiences global it systems failure. due to a "power supply issue". https://t.co/gxYj7eECtQ 2017-05-29 scotus rules that patent rights exhausted on sale of product – can't be preserved through contract restrictions. https://t.co/4zjRLm5Zl8 2017-05-31 when ai experts think ai will take your job. is it a coincidence that the furthest off is… ai… [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:29 pm
During the Annual Meeting, various ABA sections and divisions will be offering more than 250 CLE programs, including the following programs that will be offered by the Intellectual Property Law section: • Patent Reform Act 2009: A Fresh Look? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:55 am
David Kappos (the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office) writes in his blog about the ongoing effort to reengineer the MPEP. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 8:43 am
Hmmm, sort of reminds one of the IT backers of patent reform, doesn't it? [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:15 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we've missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:15 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we've missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:15 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:09 am
The patent was consequently found to be invalid for being obvious. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:09 pm
In so doing, the district court found that a lengthy document filed with the ’658 patent and referred to as “Appendix A” therein, see ’658 patent col. 13 ll. 50– 52, did not provide evidence of conception and reduction to practice sufficient to predate the Trilogy patent. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
So there is no risk of someone who learns about your invention being able to beat you to the patent office; because they're not an inventor. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 8:08 am
Josefsson has set an example here which will be followed also by other organs of the European Patent Office. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:34 am
I want to wish you all well and thank you for letting me be your editor. [read post]
