Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 6641 - 6660 of 14,176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Generally, we would think of such products as relying on trademark law rather than copyright law for any protection. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Generally, we would think of such products as relying on trademark law rather than copyright law for any protection. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
Ford's attorney e-mailed Dumont's attorney, asking that Dumont reaffirm the debt. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:17 am by Don Asher
 The ban was called the “Feres Doctrine,” referencing the Supreme Court of the United States decision in Feres v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:01 pm
In defense of a regulation that took some liberty with the language of Title V, the EPA argued that (1) the statutory language (“each” permit) didn’t quite mean what it said, when read in connection with other provisions; (2) the statutory context warranted a more latitudinarian reading; and (3) EPA’s “programmatic” reading would better serve congressional purposes. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 10:29 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The court followed the much-criticized decision in Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 9:12 pm by Scott McKeown
Moreover, a prosecution attorney’s argument regarding a prior art teaching generally does not constitute a misrepresentation. . . . [read post]