Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 6641 - 6660 of 15,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 McKenna: sometimes it’s just a state of uncertainty (difficulty in understanding) v. false actual belief. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Gabe Cazares, National Federation of the Blind: Need to be fleshed out, b/c current procedures are too burdensome. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Hacking into systems is the purview of the CFAA and state anti-hacking statutes. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:18 pm by Ron Coleman
§ 1054, ending with the commonplace that “[c]ertification marks are generally treated the same as trademarks for purposes of trademark law,” quoting Levy v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
 The judge went on to explain that, [b]efore deciding whether Riley applies to this search, the issue of Defendant's standing needs to be addressed. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:23 pm by Ben Allen
The Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:15 am
That's ANYONE in the action you started or any future litigation in the entire state. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A court’s review of a PERB's decision is limited to determining if it was affected by an error of law or it was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretionKent v Lefkowitz, 2016 NY Slip Op 03650, Court of Appeals In response to New York State Racing and Wagering Board* (the Racing Board) reducing per diem wages for its seasonal employees* by 25%, the Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO [PEF], the certified collective bargaining representative… [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 10:00 pm
The employee did not specifically state which section of the act the negligence and wantonness claims fell under but willful and intentional violation of specific written safety rules of an employer would fall under §25-5-11(c)(4). [read post]