Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 16,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2016, 9:00 am
The Plaintiff’s Vehicle Was Struck From Behind by the Defendant The plaintiff in the case of Marshall v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:00 am
The Plaintiff’s Vehicle Was Struck From Behind by the Defendant The plaintiff in the case of Marshall v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
They had two minor children. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
They had two minor children. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
” Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Cslif.) criticized the case as a waste of “time and taxpayer dollars. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:57 am
Supreme Court case Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:05 am
New York and Wickard v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Manago v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 7:07 am
State Farm – Underinsured Motorist Coverage For Maine Car Accident, Aug. 26, 2016, Portland Car Accident Lawyer Blog [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 3:32 am
In New York, the bad faith defense in dissolution proceedings traces its lineage to Matter of Kemp & Beatley, 64 NY2d 63 [1984], a landmark ruling by the state’s highest court that set the standard for minority shareholder oppression under § 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law, where the court wrote in dicta that “the minority shareholder whose own acts, made in bad faith and undertaken with a view toward… [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
MacPherson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:25 am
This process was intended for updating minor procedural rules, not for making major policy decisions. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
Disparate treatment on the basis of a foreign accent is evidence of discrimination based on race or national originJeudy v City of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 06045, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSt. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:50 am
Not with his bootlylicious bottom, but with his judgment in the case of Lancashire County Council v M & Ors [2016] EWFC 9 (04 February 2016), just published. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court precedent set in Lockhard v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am
In Holt v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
While any particular byproduct may be of minor consequence economically speaking, when viewed in a vacuum, it may not be of economic “minor consequence” to the overall finances of the taxpayer; or it may not be of minor consequence in terms of volumes manufactured and sold, or investment made to develop, manufacture, market and sell the byproduct. [read post]
