Search for: "Born v. Born" Results 6661 - 6680 of 7,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2022, 12:49 pm by Jeff Kosseff
And two of those nine—Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch—have argued that the Supreme Court should reconsider New York Times v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Feels a bit like giving in, though.Anyway: Transcript of oral argument, for those who prefer not to read secondhand postmortems.Supreme Court post-argument discussion at AU's Washington College of Law: Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 8:38 am by Cecillia Wang
Senate, Garland must make clear if he intends to be an attorney general who is willing to make needed changes so that justice and equality are a lived reality for all of us, including marginalized communities who have historically borne the brunt of failed Justice Department policies. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Jennifer's forthcoming book on this subject, A Right is Born: The Right of Publicity, Celebrity and Privacy in a Public World, will be published shortly by Harvard University Press. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
If the State Department was absolutely certain that applicants born in India and China who filed in April 2012 would receive their green cards, it would not have needed to retrogress dates back to August 15, 2007. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
That's because free speech as a judicially enforceable constitutional principle wasn't born yet and wouldn't be for another 50 years! [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:21 am
With regard to the principle of equal treatment, which is the Bundesgerichtshof’s principal concern, it should consider in particular the aspect of equal treatment of the purchasers of devices (including other devices with comparable functions) and not merely that of importers or distributors, since the burden of the levy will be borne ultimately by those purchasers. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
That is, they can be invited to enforce a federal policy (such as to do the background checks on gun buyers, at issue in the key case Printz v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That, in turn, led to his lawyers mounting a number of challenges in courts across the country, even reaching the Supreme Court in the case of Texas v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Roe was a terrible corruption of America’s constitutional jurisprudence.The Guardian also reported this from a different hearing: "Roe v Wade did constitutional cover to the elective killing of unborn children in America, period. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Born on American soil, Thomas Jefferson did not have to try to persuade USCIS that he qualified for an extraordinary ability visa. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is why the Supreme Court has rightly rejected such heightened security fee policies for parades and demonstrations in traditional public fora (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
“Emerging from a non-partisan group called Los Voluntarios, the Crusade for Justice was born out of frustration of living in a system that did not serve the residents of Denver equitably. [read post]