Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 44,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
This phrase, as well as its accompanying ‘Walking Fingers’ logo, are registered trade marks in many countries around the world, including the UK, Canada, and Australia – though curiously not the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:01 am
" Crawford v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:10 pm
We saw yet another example of this in the Nevada courts, in Baymiller v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
July 21, 1998); United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:48 am
" The judge said that wasn't good enough. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Carl Folsom won in State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:03 am
In Preston v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 4:38 am
In Greenscapes Home and Garden Products, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:22 am
Instead, the state could construct new prisons, expand existing prisons, transfer prisoners to other states or to county facilities, increase good time credits, and increase the use of diversion and community-based programs. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court made this ruling in a 7-2 decision in the case of Jerman v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 11:17 am
Similarly, Example 3 provides that a company incorporated abroad is not a U.S. business even if it exports goods to its parent corporation and other unrelated companies in the United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
" Executive Law §231, amended effective January 20, 2015, provides that Superintendent of State Police "shall develop and distribute uniform identification cards to all sworn members of New York [S]tate [P]olice, upon such members' retirement in good standing" and the phrase "retirement in good standing" means that the State Police member "retired from his or her employment for reasons other than the avoidance of… [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 11:23 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
A few years ago, in Ysbrand v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:17 am
The Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP questions at paragraph 1.7 states in relevant part The complainant must show that the name has become a distinctive identifier associated with the complainant or its goods and services. [read post]
