Search for: "President v. State" Results 6661 - 6680 of 21,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2019, 10:04 am by Sanford Hausler
  The government did not argue that the account was independent of Trump's presidency, but that the act of blocking was not state action. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 9:05 am by ernst
Why didn't Jefferson, Secretary of State Madison, or another executive official simply fire Marbury? [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
As the Article discusses, the Supreme Court considered Hamilton’s views on this subject, specifically in the context of the President’s removal authority, when deciding Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:59 pm
The CFPB made note in the consent order that the President of TitleSouth also is the General Counsel of RealtySouth. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:35 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Samsung’s penalty totaled $929 million, the sum now under appeal. from Forbes Apple v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am by WIMS
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In blue New York State, where I live and work, since even before the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:48 am by Edith Roberts
Brailsford, over which three Supreme Court Justices presided, comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, who reports that the case featured “issues still debated today: the relationship between the state and federal governments, the significance of international law, and the powers of the jury. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
Mark Rienzi is President of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a law professor at The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law, and a visiting professor at Harvard Law School. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm by John Rubin
Appeal of district court’s denial of defendant’s motion to enter judgment on PJC was not properly before Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
It thus effectively overruled State v. [read post]