Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 6661 - 6680 of 9,478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am by Melina Padron
X, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 3271 (Admin) (09 December 2011) December 9, 2011 Decision of General Medical Council to refer to doctor’s severe depression in public decision was unlawful. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 7:00 pm
"Although treating and examining physician opinions often deserve more weight than the opinions of doctors who review records...the law is clear . . . that the opinion of a treating physician does not bind the ALJ on the issue of functional capacity,'" the court ruled, quoting its opinion earlier this year in Brown v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:05 am
(Prior IntLawGrrls post) Her separate concurring opinion in Prosecutor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
In the case the state’s highest court explicitly distinguished between professional medical negligence and institutional negligence. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:50 am by Marcia Narine
The company maintained a doctored set of safety records for investigators, intimidated workers who complained of safety issues, warned miners when inspectors were coming (a crime), and had 370 violations. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
New York is, like Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Frye state (as in, Frye v United States, 293 F 1013) that permits “expert testimony based on scientific principles, procedures, or theories only after the principles, procedures, or theories have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
”  In State v. [read post]