Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 6661 - 6680 of 19,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
In the latest episode of The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers are focusing on Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Cocaine, Crack Distribution Conspirator's Sentence Reduced to 240-Month Mandatory Minimum Term United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:37 am by gmlevine
“I make no comment whatsoever” (the Panel states) “on whether or not Respondent’s use of the Domain Name and Complainant’s WALMART marks on its website might otherwise be in violation of relevant United States state or federal trademark laws. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 3:55 am by SHG
After noting that Ted Olsen, who argued Bush v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:46 am
Afterwards, he joined the United States Attorney's Office in Chicago, where he served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Criminal Division. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:30 am by Stuart Mauney
In the complaint (which was of course filed in state court), the personal representative of the estate alleges that Grandma “had hoof prints on her forehead, and incriminatin’ Claus marks on her back. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am by Ronald Collins
Brevity is one mark of a good writer; accuracy is another. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 2:27 am
”The article states Judge Thomas Zilly said he would try to be “prompt” in rendering his decision but did not set a specific date.The case cite is Experience Hendrix, LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:13 am by Marcel Pemsel
The EUIPO revoked the trade mark to a large extent. [read post]