Search for: "United States v. Mannings"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 6,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm
Koustas – We have previously reported (here, here, here, and here) on the court struggle in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) between FDA and Regenerative Sciences, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 4:10 am
This was established in the case of Nichols v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 4:10 am
This was established in the case of Nichols v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am
JEW filed a complaint for declaratory relief in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, requesting the court to declare that the above mark does not infringe or dilute any of the DUKE trademarks owned by Duke University. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:02 am
And U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Schwarzenegger in the federal United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
Murphy Law Group, LLC: If this starts to sound like a man-crush, well, guilty. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
United States, 572 U.S. 434, 457 (2014), that “every viewing of child pornography is a repetition of the victim’s abuse. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:31 pm
That’s just the way we do it in America, my man. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:31 pm
That’s just the way we do it in America, my man. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:05 am
For example, in the Bosnia v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
If it’s a descriptive claim, it seems to depend on a hidden assumption that private pursuits without a state restraining us are impossible because otherwise we would live in a Hobbesian state of nature of ceaseless war of “every man against every man. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 6:28 pm
State, No. 02-16-00195-CR (Tex. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
This seemed to have been confirmed by the decision, not long afterwards, in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 9:00 pm
I disagreed with his dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm
United States (466 U.S. 170, 182-83 (1984)) may also be difficult. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
