Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 30,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 10:44 am
We previously reported on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
The court considered a number of authorities in this regard, including X and Y v The Netherlands (App no 8978/80) and KU v Finland (App no 2872/02), in which the Strasbourg court had indicated that ECHR, art 8 placed a positive obligation on states to put in place effective deterrence measures against activities which may pose a threat to fundamental values and essential aspects of the private lives of individuals, particularly children and other vulnerable persons. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:01 pm
As you might recall, in August we blogged on Martin v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
State law prohibits the taking (read: killing) the baby crabs; i.e., any crab under six and one quarter inches in breadth. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am
In W (Algeria) (FC) and BB (Algeria) (FC) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 – read judgment The Supreme Court has made a difficult decision. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
We are discussing Jana Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 83 (30 June 2011) Appeal from: Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 723 See also: Innovation Patents Flop Like Stunned Mullet Infringement – claim construction – functional claim – whether ‘includes a pivotally moveable floor’ encompasses a mechanism in which this element is insufficient to perform a claimed function – meaning of ‘to allow’ … [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:04 am
See State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 5:46 am
The case is Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:13 am
Pattison v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 6:35 pm
CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
We have two topics dominating today’s conversation on LXBN: the Supreme Court ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:41 am
Among other claims, the jury found that plaintiffs' due process rights were violated, i.e., the procedures created by the hasty SVP were not quite fair. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
See State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:32 pm
State of Florida No. 11-13661 CA 25) that could upend the state’s nearly 80-year workers’ compensation law.The case has its genesis in a 2012 instance where a state government worker, Elsa Padgett, sustained an on-the-job injury. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:55 am
Shea in dissent) says the trial court clearly violated the confrontation clause and that the limiting instruction was not enough to ensure Orlando got a fair trial. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:16 pm
Pervez Musharraf, moves "to restore the constitution, take off his military uniform, end the national state of emergency and have free and fair elections. [read post]
