Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 6681 - 6700 of 18,111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
… DroitDu.NetDouez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
This application was dismissed by Justice Hughes in 2010, allowing Apotex to launch. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
This application was dismissed by Justice Hughes in 2010, allowing Apotex to launch. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
But Lord Justice Atkins’ conclusion on this limb of the case highlights the near-impossibility, at least in the present state of authority, of doing anything about it if a final look shows the result to be unjust. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Designs can leave some people spinning aroundAlthough it is a case management decision, there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants the judgment to get wider circulation. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Designs can leave some people spinning aroundAlthough it is a case management decision, there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants the judgment to get wider circulation. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:29 am by David Rubenstein
On the term’s final sitting day, the Supreme Court granted the government’s petition for certiorari in the travel-ban cases, and ordered re-argument in Sessions v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:15 am
 Equustek became aware that a distributor of its products, Datalink Technologies Gataways (Datalink), had re-labelled one of its products and begun selling it online, passing it off as its own. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:15 am
 Equustek became aware that a distributor of its products, Datalink Technologies Gataways (Datalink), had re-labelled one of its products and begun selling it online, passing it off as its own. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:22 am by Scott Bomboy
The Justices referenced an earlier death-sentence case, In re Kemmler from 1890, which held that the first use of the electric chair was constitutional under the 14th Amendment. [read post]