Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 19,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Constitution provides that “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Constitution provides that “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:10 pm
” The March 21, 2018 Opinion In a March 21, 2018 Opinion, Southern District of Indiana Judge William T. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 7:35 am
Don’t presume your judge knows all that you know. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
(For more on the new law, including IRS guidance on the matter, click here.) [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am
The subject-matter of independent claims 1 and 7 of auxiliary request II was obvious in particular in view of the combination of A3 and A9.X. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am
The subject-matter of independent claims 1 and 7 of auxiliary request II was obvious in particular in view of the combination of A3 and A9.X. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 10:28 pm
In most cases a day or two in either direction probably wouldn’t matter. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 12:40 pm
Well, frankly, the amount of regulation doesn’t really matter in this context, so that isn’t even the right question to ask (the “right question to ask” appears at the end of this article). [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 10:48 am
, but instead an email-esque function where parties can discuss routine matters with GAO. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:37 am
Instead, the court held, “[t]here is no guarantee of fairness when the one who appoints a judge has the power to remove the judge before the end of proceedings for rendering a decision which displeases the appointer. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 5:23 am
We thus disagree with Ben and Quinta when they write: [T]he relevant regulations [do not] preclude Mueller from behaving as Starr did. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:44 am
They shouldn’t be. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:36 pm
Carter’s Rule 60(b) motion was both timely and proper. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 2:21 pm
This matters because a form 1099 will only report the name and Social Security Number (SSN) of one taxpayer: There isn’t room for a second (or third) taxpayer’s information. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 11:37 am
But it also matters that this is simply a matter of shifting $$ from one pocket to another within the same firm. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:51 am
The plaintiffs, on the other hand, argued that the statute bars state courts only from hearing the large state-law class actions banned by Section 77p(b). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:30 am
In a post on IPBiz in the year 2005, LBE quoted from a law review article on judicial citations to the work ofKafka:Parker B. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:18 am
-Han Ming T.], 153 AD3d 1203, 1205). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:57 am
"That there were tax deductions to the donors does not change matters. [read post]
