Search for: "State v. South"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 10,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
“No one,” he writes, “with a straight face, could argue that the South was not fairly represented—or even over-represented—in the United States government. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:44 pm
” In 1961, Monroe v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 7:01 am
A South Carolina highway patrol officer stopped a car for speeding around 4:00 a.m. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
After one year, sales in the state had dropped by 24 percent, but 90 percent of that decline in sales merely represented purchases shifting to neighboring states. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 1:00 pm
Norma v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Andrew, 961 So. 2d 375, 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); see State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
under the Community Reinvestment Act A second subsidiary was also gobbled up along the way: a Bank of America subsidiary that actually went by that name, with (USA) in its name, located a bit further down South, in the dessert: Arizona. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Sebelius Docket: 11-400 Issue: (1) Whether Congress exceeds its enumerated powers and violate basic principles of federalism when it coerces states into accepting onerous conditions that it could not impose directly by threatening to withhold all federal funding under the single largest grant-in-aid program, or whether the limitation on Congress‘s spending power that this Court recognized in South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
District Court for the District of South Carolina 2012). [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
The Justice Department said on Monday that it will ask the full 12-member Fourth Circuit Court to reconsider en banc the panel decision in Al-Marri v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 2:35 am
Decisions this Week South AfricaEconomic Freedom Fighters v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Why would a person who grew up in the segregated south issue so many decisions that hurt people of color? [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
However, things went south from there. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:44 am
This sort of expert testimony was the subject of Holderbaum v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Petralia v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:19 pm
In a 1991 case of Carnival Cruise Lines v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
The keynote speaker was a South African prosecutor, well known for successfully prosecuting sexual assault. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
